Thursday, October 12, 2006
On North Korea
The demonization of North Korea by the United States government continues unrelentlessly. The wealthy oil and baseball man who claims to be president of the United States, used his first State of the Union address on January 29, 2002 to brand perennial enemy North Korea, along with former allies Iran and Iraq, as "the world’s most dangerous regimes" who now now form a threatening "axis of evil."
Unbeknown to the public, because it was intended to have remained a secret (whoops!), was the fact that this claimed president presented a "Nuclear Posture Review" report to Congress only three weeks earlier, on January 8, which ordered the Pentagon to prepare contingency plans for use of nuclear weapons. The first designated targets for nuclear attack were his newly identified members of the "axis of evil," along with four other lucky nations as well – Syria, Libya, Russia, and China. That this is nothing short of a policy of ultimate terror remains unaddressed in the U.S. media.
That Koreans are deeply concerned is an understatement. However, they understand the context in which their "evil" is being portrayed, not an altogether new threat levelled at them. However, the dangerous escalation of policy rhetoric following the 9-11 tragedy now boldly warns the world of virtual total war. Vice-president Richard Cheney, another oil man from Texas, declares that the U.S. is now considering military actions against forty to fifty nations, and that the war "may never end" and "become a permanent part of the way we live."
1 The Pentagon has declared that the widening gap between the "Haves" and "Have-nots" poses a serious challenge to the U.S., requiring a doctrine of "full spectrum dominance." Thus, the U.S. demands total capacity to conquer every place and its inhabitants in and around the Earth, from deep underground bunkers, including those in North Korea and Iraq, through land, sea, and air, to outer space. All options for achieving global and spatial hegemony are now on the table. Already, the U.S. military is deployed in 100 different countries.
2 Total war, permanent war. Terror! Addiction to use of terror by the United States is nothing new. The civilization was founded and has been sustained by use of terror as a primary policy. For example, in 1779, General George Washington ordered destruction of the "merciless Indian savages" of upstate New York, instructing his generals to "chastize" them with "terror." The generals dutifully carried out these orders.
In 1866, General William Tecumseh Sherman ordered "extermination" with vindictive earnestness of the Sioux. They were virtually exterminated. Secretary of War Elihu Root (1899-1904) under President's McKinley and Theodore Roosevelt, justified the ruthless U.S. military conduct in the Philippines that savagely killed a half-million citizens by citing "precedents of the highest authority:" Washington's and Sherman's earlier orders.
3 War against nations around the world is not new either. The U.S., over its history, has militarily intervened over 400 times, covertly thousands of times, in over one hundred nations.
4 Virtually all these interventions have been lawless. It has bombed at least eighteen nations since it dropped Atomic bombs on Japan in 1945. It has used chemical warfare against Southeast Asia, and has provided chemical warfare agents for use by other nations such as Iraq. It has used biological warfare against China, North Korea, and Cuba. The Koreans are quite aware of most of this history. Most U.S. Americans are not. But now the U.S. has declared a unilateral terrorist war on the whole world.
5 Two of the interventions in the Nineteenth Century were inflicted against Korea, the first in 1866. The second, larger one, in 1871, witnessed the landing of over 700 marines and sailors on Kanghwa beach on the west side of Korea seeking to establish the first phases of colonization. Destroying several forts while inflicting over 600 casualties on the defending Korean natives, the U.S. withdrew realizing that in order to assure hegemonic success, a much larger, permanent military presence would be necessary.
The North Korean people regularly remark about this U.S. invasion, even though most in South Korea do not know of it due to historic censorship. Most in the U.S. don’t know about it either, for similar reasons, even though in all of the Nineteenth Century, this was the largest U.S. military force to land on foreign soil outside of Mexico and Canada until the "Spanish American War" in 1898.
I believe it important for U.S. Americans to place themselves in the position of people living in targeted countries. That North Korea, a nation of 24 million people, i.e., one-twentieth the population of the U.S., many of them poor, a land slightly larger in area than the U.S. state of Pennsylvania, continues to be one of the most demonized nations and least understood, totally perplexes the Korean people. It is worthwhile to seek an understanding of their perspective.
I recently visited that nation and talked with a number of her citizens. I travelled 900 ground miles through six of North Korea's nine provinces, as well as spending time in Pyongyang, the capital, and several other cities. I talked with dozens of people from all walks of life. Though times have been hard for North Koreans, especially in the 1990s, they long ago proudly rebuilt all of their dozens of cities, thousands of villages, and hundreds of dykes and dams destroyed during the war.
U.S. interference into the sovereign life of Korea immediately upon the 1945 surrender of the hated Japanese, who had occupied the Korean Peninsula for forty years, is one of the major crimes of the Twentieth Century, from which the Korean people have never recovered. (SEE "United States Government War Crimes," Spring 2002 - issue # 1 of Global Outlook). From a North Korean’s perspective they
(1) have vigorously opposed the unlawful and egregious division of their country from day one to the present,
(2) were blamed for starting the "Korean War" which in fact had been a struggle between a minority of wealthy Koreans supporting continued colonization in collaboration with the U.S. and those majority Koreans who opposed it,
(3) proudly and courageously held the U.S. and its "crony U.N. allies" to a stalemate during the "War," and
(4) have been tragically and unfairly considered a hostile nation ever since. They have not forgotten the forty years of Japanese occupation that preceded the U.S. imposed division and subsequent occupation that continues in the South. They deeply yearn for reunification of their historically unified culture.
Everyone I talked with, dozens and dozens of folks, lost one if not many more family members during the war, especially from the continuous bombing, much of it incendiary and napalm, deliberately dropped on virtually every space in the country. "Every means of communication, every installation, factory, city, and village" was ordered bombed by General MacArthur in the fall of 1950. It never stopped until the day of the armistice on July 27, 1953. The pained memories of people are still obvious, and their anger at "America" is often expressed, though they were very welcoming and gracious to me. Ten million Korean families remain permanently separated from each other due to the military patrolled and fenced dividing line spanning 150 miles across the entire Peninsula.
Let us make it very clear here for western readers. North Korea was virtually totally destroyed during the "Korean War." U.S. General Douglas MacArthur's architect for the criminal air campaign was Strategic Air Command head General Curtis LeMay who had proudly conducted the earlier March 10 - August 15, 1945 continuous incendiary bombings of Japan that had destroyed 63 major cities and murdered a million citizens. (The deadly Atomic bombings actually killed far fewer people.)
Eight years later, after destroying North Korea's 78 cities and thousands of her villages, and killing countless numbers of her civilians, LeMay remarked, "Over a period of three years or so we killed off - what - twenty percent of the population."
6 It is now believed that the population north of the imposed 38th Parallel lost nearly a third its population of 8 - 9 million people during the 37-month long "hot" war, 1950 - 1953, perhaps an unprecedented percentage of mortality suffered by one nation due to the belligerance of another.
Virtually every person wanted to know what I thought of Bush's recent accusation of North Korea as part of an "axis of evil." Each of the three governments comprising Bush’s "axis of evil" of course immediately condemned the remarks, North Korea being no exception. I shared with them my own outrage and fears, and they seemed relieved to know that not all "Americans" are so cruel and bellicose. As with people in so many other nations with whom the U.S. has treated with hostility, they simply cannot understand why the U.S. is so obsessed with them.
Koreans were relieved to learn that a recent poll had indicated eighty percent of South Koreans were against the U.S. belligerant stance against their northern neighbors. The North Korean government described Bush as a "typical rogue and a kingpin of terrorism" as he was visiting the South in February, only three weeks after presenting his threatening State of the Union address.
7 It was also encouraging that the two Koreas resumed quiet diplomatic talks in March just as the U.S. and South Korea were once again conducting their regular, large-scale, joint military exercises so enraging to the North, and to an increasing number of people in the South among the growing reunification movement there.
8 In the English-language newspaper, The Pyongyang Times, (February 23, 2002) there were articles entitled "US Is Empire of the Devil," Korea Will Never Be a Threat to the US," and "Bush’s Remarks Stand Condemned." Quite frankly, all three of these articles relate a truth about the U.S. that would draw a consensus from many quarters around the world.
While in country, together we listened to Bush's March 14 Voice of America (VOA) radio chastizement of North Korea. First, he stated that the North's 200,000 prisoner population was proof of terrible repression. Though I had no way of knowing the number of prisoners in the North, any more than Bush did, I do know that the United States has 2 million prisoners which is similar in per-capita detention rate to that of North Korea if the 200,000 figure is accurate.
Furthermore, the U.S. has a minimum of 3 million persons, mostly minority and poor, under state supervision of parole and probation. The U.S. sweeps its class and race problems into prison.
Second, Bush declared that half the population was considered unreliable and, as a result, received less monthly food rations.
The Koreans are a proud people living in a Confucian tradition, having rebuilt their nation from virtual total destruction during the Korean war. I did not notice any obvious display of dissent. That some Koreans are desperate due to lack of food, water, and heat, especially in some rural areas, does not necessarily translate into dissent, though some are seeking relief by travel to neighboring countries.
9 Third, Bush claimed that Koreans who listen to foreign radio are targeted for execution. Together we regularly listened to U.S.VOA radio broadcasts and they freely discussed the content of the broadcasts without fear of reprisals.
Fourth, Bush condemned the DPRK for spending too much on its military, causing food shortages for the people. Note: Again it must be remembered that it was the U.S. that unilaterally divided Korea following the Japanese surrender in August 1945, and subsequently ruled with a military occupation government in the south, overseeing the elimination of virtually the entire popular movement of (majority) opposition to U.S. occupation, murdering hundreds of thousands of people.
The consequent Korean civil war that openly raged in 1948-1950 was completely ignored when the U.S. defined the beginning of the Korean War in 1950. The U.S. remains at war with the DPRK, never having signed a peace treaty with her. The war has left a deep scar in the Korean character with a memory that is regularly provoked by continued belligerance directed at the DPRK.
The U.S. regularly holds joint military exercises with South Korean military forces aimed at the DPRK. The U.S. retains 37,000 military troops at 100 installations south of the 38th parallel. The U.S. has its largest Asian bombing range where it practices bombs five days a week, fifty-two weeks a year, despite opposition from many South Koreans. And now Bush has identified North Korea as part of an "axis of evil" targeted for nuclear attack. This is no remote idea to North Koreans. The U.S. possesses nuclear weapons on ships and planes in the Pacific region surrounding North Korea. Virtually every nation in this perilous position would be concerned about their defense.
It is worth noting that the United States is the leading military spender in the world resulting in substantial underfunding of its own indispensable social programs.
Fifth, Bush accused the DPRK of selling weapons to other nations. That is like the pot calling the kettle black. The U.S. is by far the largest manufacturer of conventional, nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons in the world. It is also the largest seller of these weapons, and has used conventional (against dozens of nations), biological (Cuba, China, Korea, perhaps others), chemical (Southeast Asia), and nuclear (Japan, and threatened to use them on at least 20 other occasions) weapons.
In addition it has armed other nations with these weapons of mass destruction, including Iraq, one of those countries now identified as part of the "axis of evil." In the year 2000, international arms sales were nearly $37 billion, with the U.S. being directly responsible for just over half of those sales. South Korea was the third largest buyer of weapons from the United States with $3.2 worth of military hardware.10 And in January 2002, South Korea was seriously contemplating purchasing an additional $3.2 billion worth of 40 F-X fighter jets from U.S. arms giant Boeing.
At the conclusion of this VOA radio broadcast, Koreans and I looked at each other in disbelief. But we also knew that we were in solidarity with each other as part of the human family. When I said goodbye to my new friends we embraced knowing that we live in a single world made up of a rich diversity of ideas and species. We know that we are going to live or die together, and hope that the arrogant and dangerous rhetoric and militarism of the United States will soon end so we can all live in peace. However, for that to happen, there will need to be a dramatic awakening among the people and a corresponding expression of massive nonviolent opposition that will make such threatening behavior impossible to carry out.
Keep Them Out
*
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
Dreaming Of Reality
I danced with the Ballet Folclórico de la Universidad de Guadalajara, generally regarded as Mexico’s premier troupe. The statement in itself is true but reality of its implication little more than a dream.
My wife and I watched their performances in appreciative wonder many times in the city’s renowned Teátro Degollado. It was out of sense of cultural loyalty that we attended when they ventured to our town’s small auditorium. We were close friends with the woman who operated the auditorium and her husband, who had charge of a dining hall.
The friendship brought us invitations to a dinner fiesta the two hosted for the dance troupe after the local performance. My wife seemed to be hiding her face behind a tortilla on break out of joint rhythmic clapping and chants of “baile baile” at my friend’s announcement to the group we had taken lessons in folkloric dancing.
Wife’s embarrassment notwithstanding, and being of the show off rather than embarrassment prone type, there was nothing else I could do. My boots were of proper sort and a pretty young señorita, still in chino poblano stage dress, lowered a traditional charro sombrero on my head, took my hand, and lead me to center of the floor where someone graced my shoulder with a Saltillo serape. With hands clasped behind the back, my boots whirling, and her skirt swirling, we tapped together for a minute or so the zapateado de Jarabe Tapatio in rapid clapped rhythm of 6/8 time. Yes, I danced with the Ballet Folclórico de la Universidad de Guadalajara.
Mariachi Vargas de Tecolitlán, another premier group, will be in town Saturday and my brags may become more preposterous. If you have heard mariachi recordings, the chances are they were by Vargas. All of Mexico knows there is no better. Once again, cultural loyalty dictates. As boots took me to the dance fiesta, I could not deny my guitar knowing Vargas. It is the right build and my fingers know the tunes and style. “Yep folks, I played with Mariachi Vargas de Tecolitlán!” I’ll be able to say. (shhh about quietly fingering from a back audience seat rather than stage.) Claim of dancing and playing with famous groups sounds good. True yes. Reality?
“I am an enemy of the (US) state” was another claim to hot-shot-ism. Some agencies and persons thought it was real rather than dream and may still. So did I. It is true most of a long adult life was engaged in trying to destroy what I perceived bad in US culture by turning it inside out. An initial obligating motive was to get things right before our kids grew up.
But, I had another only recently realized and acknowledged motive for dancing on the US radical activist stage. It surfaced from reading internet blogs of US ‘liberal’ and even proclaimed ‘radical’ and 'revolutionary' activists who just can't seem to shake their heads from fixation on changing their nation. Theirs and my unrealized motives seem to rest in preserving and raising to the fore what within its culture could be considered good. In contrast, I view such collection now as faded to transparency of never were, never can be, never will be.
Underneath, there was always the unrealized intent of saving the system I’d been propagandized to believe existed just a little bit under current actuality. The effect was to contribute to the system’s perpetuation as it is.
That I appeared to be an enemy of the state, was dancing and playing on the surface just as ballet and mariachi stories. The worthy features of the US I thought real or at least realizable were as illusory as the dancing. I was unwittingly working to save what I claimed to fight.
The growth years of even our children’s children have now passed. I cannot wait for a next batch on which in pretense to rest a motive. It is time instead to quit dancing and live life’s remainder awakened from dreams inserted in US elementary school.
Now I just want the US to go away. It probably won’t by any contributory action of mine. There is little I can do to aid the demise. What I can do and have done is distance from it figuratively and virtually.
People in this forum are right if they've sensed I have no concern for improving quality of events or future within the US. I don't give a damn what and how things are and are not done up north. Gone are the days of boastful pretense as dancer, mariachi, and unintentional savior of something deservedly lost.
The reality lies in hopes that enough outside its borders, geographic and self imposed imaginative, muster sufficient determination and wherewithal to construct a suitable garbage disposal. Then the air might be cleared enough to better see, sort, and distill the good from the bad that have long existed in other societies more worthy of observation.
Not sure what to say but like pisces said it is a good post .But i have never wanted anything but real peace .And with saying that be safe walk in peace allways.
Coming even that close to the folkloric ballet and being a great mariachi must have felt great, or you wouldn't of mentioned it. I feel that way towards Argentine tango.
The problem is that when a factor pollutes in the US, its pollution doesn't care about borders.
Regards.
Death Penalty
Flowers into the Thames - against the death penalty
This is reprinted from the blog of Iranian feminist and socialist Maryam Namazie, who is also a team member of my blog
.
Happy Birthday!
Our Library came about in March 2004 to support a public Yahoo Government and Politics category chat room titled Further Left which had existed since August 2003. Yahoo shut down its user created chat rooms in mid June 2005 and the Chat Room was then installed elsewhere. The Further Left Forum was born to join them one year ago today. Growth has been parented by contributions of its current 15 team members and 27 others. Happy Birthday to all of us!
A good one year for you Further Left Forum. I remember the day it started, there was knowledge this would work. The truth catches on, and when linked with other truths becomes stronger.
Sunday, October 08, 2006
Comments On Poll #5
well i wish im my heart and soul it would not have to be violent to become free but not so easy as i learned in last pole.
I have never wanted to see any human or life hert sad im starting to think violance is a answer when so many could stand together in nonviolance protest as one and fix things .But we are what we have become i guess.
this is a poll about the real choice facing anyone awakening from the dream and perceiving the nightmare of the neocon nightmare. Bravo.
There does not seem to be anything effective in ending oppression, we keep spiraling down to humanities end. But I will say non violence, it is where we should want to be and without that goal always in mind, violence becomes the way. But I say this with mixed emotions, because what is one to do when attacked but fight back. So part of me says violence, no choice.
Revolutions are as inevitable as waves on a beach so long as people believe they need to be governed. The time has come to honor that within us that is much more and better than the standards by which we are judged. Unite behind the commonality and strength of natural diversity and the need to let it grow.
Nonviolent political action promises realities of state power can be transcended through good feelings and purity of purpose. It in fact reinforces the same status-quo it claims to oppose. It depends upon and advertises the system is just. It isn't. That is the very reason for opposing it.
Resorting to violence will lower us to their level teach religious cheerleaders and other whores of those we oppose. Testimony to moral superiority by our side might make comfort zone protestors believe they'll all march to heaven (same fantasy) at their time of slaughter, but gaining get out of hell cards is not what struggle is about.
It is about winning by applying power to power. People with it don't relinquish it because they're proven morally deficient. They already know that and don't give a damn. It is exactly why they have power. That power is shed only either to save their asses or because they have no asses left to save.
Gandhi is often offered as example of a pacifist achieving his goal, but that success came at the end of long violent struggle. Those guys Kipling poetisized were shooting back. How far could Martin Luther King Jr or SNCC have gone were it not for Blacks taking to the streets in their own fashion? Remember "Burn baby burn"? Most don't know at the time movement icons were making speeches to tranquilize the press, advocates more interested in change than encouraging white posturing were in the boondocks training with weapons.
It wasn't waving cute worded placards in the wind, singing cum by ya, and lighting candles that convinced Americans to get out of Vietnam while any still survived. Breaking State Street windows, treating cops to their own medicine, and disruption and destruction halting normal commerce did help Americans accede that enough was enough. However, the change took place because Vietnamese placed more trust in guns than slogans.
Consider where profound wide spread change has occurred. Do France, USA, Russia, Mexico, China, Cuba, and ..., etc, etc, etc ring any bells? Constitutions and social organization came after. The shooting came first. Without the first, there wouldn't have been a last.
Talk today to the Bushes, Blairs, Olmerts, the kings, princes, and dictators aligned with them. Talk to all those who in effect offer support by not effectively opposing them. Convince instead those bastards to apply non violent protest in quest of what they seek. Let them feel moral making placards, singing songs, and lighting candles. Good luck.
I doubt there are any who took time out from jungle fighting to cast votes in our poll. There certainly are not any from among those too poor to play computer. I also suspect most of the votes accrued were not drawn from experience in non violent protest, certainly not any bearing lasting success. There ain't no such animal. The last phrase of our forum purpose is "...as they see fit". Good thing that leaves the vote that matters in the hands of those who want it most.
Despite the contention that non-violent protests only reinforce the opinon that the regime protested is just, I think they are more likely to gain new supporters through their brave, peaceful, obvious presence and message. Any attack upon them only emphasizes the unjust character of the regime, much more than two sides killing each other ever could. I'm not saying violence is not valid, but if winning hearts and minds is the goal, non-violence is the more persuasive. Experience may laugh at my naiveté, but I speak from the heart more than the spleen.
¿Our Plans?
I haven't read through either blog, but do you plan on discussing more of Bush's using the Constitution as a baby wipe or are we digging into the global US vision that isn't working and never was going to work. Get a hold of dumb bunny Bob Woodward's latest--even he saw the nakedness of the Emperor.
# posted by Enemy of the Republic @ 07:58
Plans? Not really. What we go with will depend on what people such as yourself send us. We do have a page head stated purpose and say we welcome contributions advancing it. The Posting Guide details how to go about that. So, no plans, but there are a few wishes.
One is that as a team we continue and improve in helping ourselves and some who happen here to drift further (left) toward observation of selves and encircling world in light of what we present. Personal blogs concentrate on individual views of first concern to those team members having them. Those are joined in what appears here, and it is the mix that makes the Forum what it is.
That most recently have been through comments on thread initiating posts of a few, leads to a second wish that could aid realization of the first. It is that more team members go beyond quick comment comebacks and lead us where we might go by applying time, effort, and risk of outlook to creating thread beginning Forum posts. It would make our 'team' more a team than a Blogger word and enhance what we do together in meeting our purpose.
But yes we have an EVIL agenda! We seek to turn this World into a weaponles, dictatorship-less, famineles, diseaseles, povertyles, God-less UTOPIA, where everyone is free to listen to the music of one's choise, without having to worry that one's house is going to be shelled by The Axis of Greater Good for US because it happened to be under the air navigation path used by Air Farse One on it's way to "friendly" Saudi Arabia.
Mwahahahahahaha!!!!
(sorry for that last bit, I got carried away)
Politkovskaya
Prominent Russian journalist, Anna Politkovskaya, known for her harsh criticism of the Kremlin’s policies and Vladimir Putin’s regime, was killed in the Russian capital on Saturday evening.
Politkovskaya worked as a reporter for the Novaya Gazeta daily. She rose to prominence and achieved international recognition for her critical coverage of developments in Russia’s restive southern province of Chechnya and other North Caucasian provinces.
One of Russia’s most respected journalists, she was known as a tireless investigative reporter. She’d authored a critical book on Russia’s president and his campaign in Chechnya, and wrote sympathetic stories about Chechen refugees.
The International Federation of Journalists Secretary-General stated "Politkovskaya’s slaying was clearly a “targeted assassination.”
There is a full story on Moscow News.
If we are to tribute all journalists assasined for doing their job with clear consciense we would need another 10 blogs at least...
Liberty of press is a must!
Sadly, it is the newspapers who act as references after 100 years for research, journalists with gutts should reflect the reality of the situation without lip-service to the rulers. We had our share of assasinated journalists over here ...
May She Rest In Peace (even though I never read anything for her, but freedom of expression is a must!!)
MFL
This was copied from yesterday's post on troutsky's blog and pasted here as appropiate to this post. I would rather that he had put it here, but by whatever route, I think he had something to say.
In Mexico, not so very far from our little pink houses, Oaxacan rebels have siezed a radio station called La Ley and are using it to broadcast their calls for solidarity and justice. 20,000 Mexican soldiers are massed nearby. Vincente Fox is obviously weighing the effects of an all out assault. The Inter-American Press Association and the Ass. of Mexican Newspaper Editors have denounced the occupation. In the corporate media, the division of labor requires the manufacturers of consent to merge with State interests and they do not like having an independent group confiscating their own means of production (producing information, propaganda, etc) An independent voice can bring ideas , the most dangerous enemy of the Corporate State. A slow burning fuse has been lit in this "other" America but of course here in the Homeland we are consumed with penis scandals and the Axis of Evil. In Venezuela, independent radio stations carry the rythm of the Bolivarian Revolution throughout the favelas of Caracas and beyond. Our local station here in Montana carries Country Western ( the Special Olympics of Music) and right- wing talk shows. Pehaps it needs a shakeup?
I wish all people of truth and peace where safe but in a lieing controled world people of truth and real peace are a threat to the liers and controlers sad but i think TRUE.
It is a risky business telling the truth in that society.I heard that fourteen journalists have been killed but I forget over what time span.It seems there would be less direct ways to silence the press and reporters, more like what they do here in the US but Russia seems like it is in the gangster phase of capitalism.
The assassin was able to escape security cameras, and shoot at close range. Not the work of an amateur.
Great Russian nationalism is a side effect of Stalinism, that Putin doesn't want to end.
Troutsky: Fourteen journalists were killed during Putin's reign.
Breaking Free
*Latin America Declares Independence
*
For contrast, consider Bolivia and Evo Morales' election last December. Voters were familiar with the issues, very real and important ones like national control over natural gas and other resources, which has overwhelming popular support. Indigenous rights, women's rights, land rights and water rights were on the political agenda, among many others. The population chose someone from its own ranks, not a representative of narrow sectors of privilege.
It is very telling that the corporatizing of the planet is met with far more outspoken and effective resistance from cultures still in closest relationship to the nature of the planet and least addicted to corporate crap. They are not only rejecting the idea of paying anything for what has always been free, but also teaching respect for nature to a bunch of bean counters who couldn't have cared less until confronted by people who still remember. In the US such rip offs just appear as rising prices on something already too expensive, it is the price they are willing to pay for the illusion of a higher standard of living.
People spoke their minds, elected their representative, and the corporate mafia labeled them as terrorists and supportive of terrorism because mafia lost it's control over the people. May we all become free terrorists!
Friday, October 06, 2006
The Wall
*Border Wall Plan
Considered Offensive, Shameful
" Mexico lobbied for six years for a comprehensive immigration reform that would allow millions to cross into the United States legally. Instead, it got a wall".
American mentality has lead to building a wall between them and Mexico to keep the workers out. They are getting the support of their public by relying on their terrorist scare. Migrant workers and terrorists are becoming one in the minds of many of their people. America thinks they can just fence themselves in and abuse the world and they will be safe. But all this does is push their reputation for evil and oppression into the forefront and sends that message. America has come so far from the country that use to be looked up to, now to a country that has to be protected from, even for its own citizens. A very dangerous place.
"We are supposed to be neighbors and friends, and instead of building bridges and doors, we´re building obstacles,"
You don't need intellectual social political analysis to understand about the US what almost all Mexicans do and almost all 'Americans', as they erroneously call themselves, don't.
I talked a couple hours ago to a friend of many years who is from a small and poor native pueblo in the southern state of Oaxaca. He sells baskets on the streets here that his family makes there. Neither he nor any in his family has ever been or entertain any wishes to go the US. However, since customers are mostly gringo tourists, he often brings up that country with me in questioning how one says this or that in English. This time there was no question. Instead he commented on the wall, one more insulting topic on the minds of many Mexicans. He didn't have to ask but already knew and expressed what was already my opinion.
The goofy wall won't stop anyone and its motivation is making money. It would appear on the surface its reason is throwing an election sop to US racism, but that grease that lubricates the wheels of its commerce is about making money too. So understands a poor native basket maker with no formal higher education from Oaxaca where today his people are barricading streets in opposition to its government.
Technological development has caused the world to change so much in increasing movement of people and universal spread of information. There is no wall that can slow that except refusal to see beyond. The self constructed barrier to comprehending that is the real wall around the United States.
That is evident in its people, all of them, from those in leadership to MacDonald patrons; living in mansions, suburbs, and ghettos; writing; directing, and announcing what they think is news; It is seen in admitted racists of the Minute men as the play homemade soldier and also among academic bigots disguising themselves as neo conservatives and those hiding from it by adopting "libertarian" as pretentious hooray for me and fuck everyone else moniker.
Neither are those from there proclaiming themselves radical leftists immune as can be seen on the blogs we visit and read shouts of all that is wrong with their US. While they maintain a usually unstated and often hidden and perhaps even unrealized goal of saving the nation from what others but never them have made it, they exhibit no comprehension its problem is not who made it that or even what it is, but simply that it and they exist on the wrong side.
Well then if i read correctly even the little im able to do in my way is not good enuff .We are doomed for others to blindly judge us as our goverment has done so many times to so many people .God forgive us all The END
Team members were divided on accepting the comment below. See our Posting Guide and the author's blog.
Zatikia,
You said: "America thinks they can just fence themselves in and abuse the world and they will be safe."
America is a sovereign nation just like Mexico. As such, it has over the last 200+ years evolved into a nation which is governed by a rule of law and order just like Mexico. It is the wish of the citizens of this country that our borders be secured but for the last 30 years or so our government leaders have allowed the orderly system of legal immigration to devolve into chaos. Why? So that large agricultural, manufacturing and service industries will have a plentiful supply of cheap labor. Both Mexican and US leadership's lack of border enforcement has been, and is now, criminal in nature.
I was an immigrant. I came here legally after submitting papers and waiting for 3 years.
Do you mind it if you are waiting in line and someone steps in front of you? How about if it is a never ending stream of people stepping in front of you? Is this fair?
Sweet Sonshine, I had the same reading, posted a question of it, and then deleted it on grounds that it was too personal and divisive. Thank you for saying it in such a way that if I had thought of your good words, my comment would still be there.
Roman, People migrate in many different ways, the paper trail is one of them, and on the long time invitation of plenty in America is another. Come and get it, however you can has been the attitude and not such an easy one to stop. America has always let in a certain amount with papers and a certain amount without. Securing the border and terrorism should have nothing to do with it, but that is the new drive behind it. America should be thankful it gets its much needed workers, however they managed to get there. There is a new hysteria that has caught on over the workers due to the nation fearing so much for themselves. My personal opinion is that the border situation has become a real money maker for so many and a way to exhibit power, it really has little to do with the poor worker seeking a job. Thank you for your view, I know many feel your way about it.
I don't believe it is a matter of whether or not one is doing enough. There are no prizes for those who might think they are. No one is - anywhere, as long as there is suffering in the world - anywhere. There will always be calls for more. They were heard long before we arrived. They will beg for more long after we are gone. The best we can do is devote the remainder of our lives to utilizing as able our various means to advance in the direction of our hopes. The only valid judgement of individual manner and extent is the one we each personally pass upon ourselves. My own: I am the enemy for that which I could do but do not.
The wall in Berlin was designed to keep people in, imprisoned in "the workers' paradise"; the walls on the Mexican border of the US and on the border of the Palestinian Territories are designed to keep people out. Is this difference trivial, do you think?
Isn't it to keep people of the US in? I mean in secluded shelter from the "Evil" World outside and their sinful Ideas? To keep them in the McDonalds Hollywood Paris Hilton Paradise they're living in?
Tuesday, October 03, 2006
Threats
*Leftist Groups as Terrorist Threats
*
"The now-declassified summary of the National Intelligence Estimate on "Trends in Global Terrorism" focuses almost exclusively on Islamic extremists. But inserted at the very end is this one overlooked, though seemingly quite important, passage that identifies other terrorist threats". This article goes on to explain.
It is obvious from the way America is headed that they will soon object to the freedom of the internet and use terrorism as a reason to oppress it.
Terror is a tactic, that is used by good and bad causes. It is always wrong. In essense it's a tactic.
I think we have to change the dialog. Our war is against the two pillars of evil, imperialism and Islamism.
I am not very selective as to qualifying who is the enemy. We played a game as kids called "King of the Hill". There was a slight rise in the ground in a nearby cemetery (symbolic ?). Someone stood on top and all the others tried to knock them off, and then whoever could get there would occupy the top.
There were no rules, anything went. No theory or justification was needed. There was just a goal. I liked the knocking off part better than being on top. It was more fun. Sometimes there was collateral damage, a bloody nose, cut lip, maybe a broken arm, but that was part of growing up.
Maybe I never did, for I still like being on the bottom and considering as target of my war whomever is on top, anytime, anywhere, and for whatever reason.
Beware, those who would aspire to the crest. I have friends down here at the bottom and anything goes.
I remember that game and i dont know many who ever stayed at the top long but sometimes the view from there when not playing "king of the hill "was cool tho a few sitting in peace just watching around was also cool i think.
The top is always relative to ones values. Oppression, unless by physical coercion, is also relative to ones values.
The degree to which ones life is self-sufficient is inversely proportional to the influence of the wealth and attitude of others. The degree of ones dependence on being served by society is directly responsible for ones sense of status and ill treatment seen as oppression.
There are still many Americans that think el Qaida was responsible for the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The real enemy is not "Islamo-fascism", "Radical Islam" and "Muslim Extremists". The real enemy is "Judeo-fascism", "Radical Judaism" and "Jewish Extremists". Or in one word Zionism. It is a proven fact that the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 were commited by Mossad - the Israeli spy agency - in coordination with Jewish and Christian Zionists in America, working in the Media, F.B.I., C.I.A., and many corporations. Instead of looking for Osama bin Laden, we should be looking for the Israeli Mossad agents responsible for planting explosives in the world trade center, among many other crimes. The Zionist controlled media, blames Osama bin Laden for the September 11, 2001 attacks and U.S. embassy bombings, when there is over-whelming evidence that Mossad was responsible for these and many other horrific terrorist activities. There are even many former Mossad, F.B.I., C.I.A. and MI6 agents that testify on how the Zionists use the U.S. and U.K. governments to conduct terrorism against their own citizens, to generate the hatred and patriotism needed to wage wars against Israel's enemies.
The reason why the Zionist controlled Illuminati want the world to hate el Qaida, is because el Qaida is an obstacle in their plans for world domination, they got rid of the Soivet Union, and now they are focusing on Muslims that want to unite Muslim countries by over-throwing the anti-democratic tyrants that the Illuminati supports, el Qaida simply wants to unite Muslim countries. But the Illuminati, consider the union of Muslim countries a threat to their plans for global domination, they are actively targeting Pan-Islamists as they used to actively target Internationalist Communists.
The Zionists are cutting the taxes and engaging in privatization in the U.S. and U.K., so the Zionist corporations have much more money to fund Israel, at the same time so much money is used for war, that eventually it will lead to such a major deficit, that their economies will crash like the economies of other countries that Zionists used to support Israel. Please look up the Rothschild blood line's history, and you will discover the roots of the Illuminati. Also research on the meanings of the Masonic symbols in back of the U.S. dollar bill. Skull & Bones, and all the other organizations of the Illuminati, have a wicked plot for world domination, they seem to have much power, but their power will quickly dwindle as more and more people refuse to believe their propaganda, and investigate the system of the Illuminati, rather than foolishly thinking that the existance of the Illuminati is impossible.
By the way, it is very important to remember that our enemy is Zionism, not Jews, there are many many Jews that are against Zionism, and risk their life by speaking out about Zionist terrorism
Here are two very informative sites, proving that Zionists, were responsible for the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and many many other terrorist attacks, and also many wars.
sac911truth.com
killtown.911review.org
What I understandis that a fanatic middle aged criminal human right viloating Wahabite Saudi faction that spread lies against Islam and the very Muslims it pretends to protect is actually good and that all this pandemonium is created to stop Al Qaida's Great Third Reaich of Wahabism?
Go read some conspiracy theories!!
Saturday, September 30, 2006
Evo Morales
*And here is another interesting article titled, How to Solve the Problems of Globalization, with Evo Morales in a debate.
"The Bolivian model is an alternative model. It recognizes the need for an economic and political program to not only stop the current abuse, but also to address the impoverishment and corruption of hundreds of years".
An important man to watch.
Bless this man and may his life be blessed with being safe and any one wishing to harm him be stoped.He has a great caring spirit my THOUGHTS.
mAY HE BE SAFE AND WALK IN PEACE ALLWAYS AND SHOW THE WORLD A TRUE WAY
Sonshine
Sonshine, these are the things that are important in this world, men like Evo Morales. What America is or isn´t is not important compared to what these type of nations and leaders can become. This is where we need to direct our view to find out about a better possible world.
most posative stuff and people wow what a great idea to learn of all the great good leaders for all the people around would be so cool and thanks for sharing it makes me think of moving there lol im sure tho thay have enuff people tho.O and then i would have to learn another language and im still trying to uderstand english so many same and diffrent words in one word so confussing.
For the first time I agree.
Sonshine, stop apologizing for your English, really. No need: others could learn from you many things.
yeah does a happy dance we agree we all need to learn more about the good people and how to make a better world in a good way yeah I like morales you like him she likes him we like him yeahhhhhh
Friday, September 29, 2006
American Fascism
*1.) Powerful and Continuing Nationalism:: Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.
2.) Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights: Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc
3.) Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause: The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.
4.) Supremacy of the Military: Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.
5.) Rampant Sexism: The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.
6.) Controlled Mass Media: Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.
7.) Obsession with National Security: Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.
8.) Religion and Government are Intertwined: Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.
9.) Corporate Power is Protected: The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.
10.) Labor Power is Suppressed: Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.
11.) Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts: Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.
12.) Obsession with Crime and Punishment: Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.
13.) Rampant Cronyism and Corruption: Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.
14.) Fraudulent Elections: Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections
This post is redundant, as it is actually in the "prose and poetry" section of this very site.
Also, Umberto Eco did that stuff already in 1995. People kinda get overexcited about that stuff, I guess.
Soeren, Thank you for the reminder. Maybe it will get some new attention out here in public. Our library has many interesting things in it. Umberto Eco seems to say it much better, but I have always liked his writing. Good link.
I disagree that US is fascist. If Bush is fascist, what is Hillary? John Kerry? They too are part of the government.
To really understand fascism, see this important link at marxists.org.
That only makes stronger the pitty i feel for US citizens... The only terror they live is inside their minds. That's worst kind of terror.
Thank you for the link Renegade Eye. I don´t think America really falls under one of those words that have already been used, it is something new. What is interesting is that one can find so much similarity between present day America and these leaders of the past. What they are labeled is a matter for debate, but the truth of what they have done should be plain for all to see.
Any doubt remaining about US being fascist has been voted away in the US congress today, 65 (including 12 Democrats) to 34, as a bill to pre-exonerate the administration of any war crimes, do away with habeas corpus and condone torture passed a final tally. The government could not have gotten this corrupt if Democrates actually were the opposition. The whole apple is rotten and we whittle our days away debating which half is least evil.
If the US was fascist, this blog would be closed.
By calling the US fascist, you are only campaigning for the Democratic Party.
This blog is not hosted in the United States. It is not maintained from the United States. Eleven of its 15 Forum Team Members do not live in the United States. Its Chat room had been shut down over a year ago by a system operating from the United States. Its Library is not hosted in the United States. That Library was kicked off a host in Mexico run by a Canadian seven months ago because its content drew regular denial of service hack attacks from the United States. The United States is not the center of the world. The United States is a very young nation. The years of my life span one third of its meager 230. I recall very few of those when the United States was not off slaughtering people. I don't give a damn which or whose political party is enhanced or ended in the United States. The only thing I would like ehanced are the lives of suffering people outside the United States. The only thing I would like to see ended in the United States is the United States. Its people seem without intending to be doing a pretty good job of that. I am here to help them along.
Renegade Eye,
The blog is here because Yahoo shut down the Further Left Political chatroom. Their reason was that some children were exposed to bad things in chat rooms. Notice that there are still all sorts of sex related chatrooms like BDSM, Fetishes, Gay Male, Lesbian, Married and Looking, Masturbation, Role Playing, Straight on Yahoo. However, all political discussion has been reduced to one category: Government and Politics. All the political rooms are gone. Why???
I listen to internet radio. Several of the political stations have been raided and no longer exist. Some of the more progressive and hard hitting talk show hosts have been removed from broadcast stations recently due to mysterious program changes.
I can go on ... Have you really looked around. The "You are either with us or you are a terrorist" attitude is very pervasive in the rest of media - TV, AM Radio, even books in the library. Why???
Why do people have to be locked into a "Free Speech Zone" when there are political meetings? Why can't everyone be heard? Really ask youself if this is normal. Is this what you expect out of a free speech democracy?
By the time this blog gets shut down, it may be too late. You will be living in a Facist country. I believe it already is. Take a close look at the definition of Corporatism, the first meaning of Fascism (the one Mussolini invented) . You might have an a-ha moment.
I was a Republican before 9/11 and had my a-ha moment when the US flew a corporate jet around the country to take Saudis home even though no other planes were allowed to fly. Why???
HiTek
Renegade eye,
I was thinking of just the opposite from your claim that "if the US were fascist, the blog would be closed" in that if the US were not fascist, this blog would not be here in the first place, nor would I. And to still be hanging on to good party/ bad party, good cop/ bad cop, is to ignore the bureaucracy that is always there using the pair to massage the populace to sleep thinking their best interests must be in there somewhere.
Fascism is different than a conservative government. It is different than a military dictatorship.
Under fascism this blog wouldn't exist. Fascism is about the total annihilation of the progressive and revolutionary movement.
Again see: http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1944/1944-fas.htm#p0
Fascism, Marxism, Comunism, Revolution... These are only lines used to feed the revolted unsatisfied desperate masses. They're all ideologies which have proven their total undeniable practical failure. What I know is what I see. I know something is corrupt when I see a joke of a country of cave-dwellers brutally destroyed because of a need for scapegoats; when I see another enfamished and empoverished people, who's only fault is to be born on petroleum, murdered in the name of liberation; when I see the last glowing candle of democracy of the Middle East being brutally and repeatedly raped under the aproving, obsesively excited look of the US for the mere satisfaction of their sadistic pleasures.
That's wrong.
Sonshine's post, "hummmm", wins the prize in this go around of who can define how many words. That's something even Americans should understand. Unfortunately it is probably not the case for they've already murdered almost all among them who might. Anyhow, it is nice there is at least one gracing our presence that does. For the others, the word "hummmm" means "shit" in Apache.
Puppeteer, can you clarify your post, I didn't get (just curious about the last candle light of democracy...I live there :P)
MFL
What I actually mean that ideology isn't important. What counts is our humanity, our capacity for compasion, which we obviously lost. That's what the last agression on Lebanon was: the funeral of our humanity.
renegade eye,
"Fascism is about the total annihilation of the progressive and revolutionary movement."
Apparently you will not see the overt policies of the US government, becoming more blatant everyday as fascism until you yourself are in jail to qualify it as "total." Until such time, you prefer to call it a conservative government in which the democrats are the saving grace. Such equivocation will not put you last on their menu.
Once in a while you come across something that coalesces unfocused thoughts. Zatikia's new post on her own blog titled "About Getting Along" did that. I suspect this string of comments may have been motivation. It is worth reading by all who have read or posted here if for no other reason than to wrap this thing up. So is the Forum's Posting Guide, particularly its first paragraph, which seems now to have been written in precognition. Or, was it because we've been there before and don't intend going back?
The general problem of all this...
Is that opinions are like assholes,
everybody has one.
And secondforth, everybody on here should change their records on the grammophones of their minds.
All this United States bashing makes
one want to buy a Stars and Stripes, wrap myself in it, get 10 bottles of Jack's Old No. 7 and sing the star-spangled-banner on top of my lungs.
How about showing the people some alternatives and not just say:"oh, look at those fascists, we cannot do anything against them!"
Plot on solutions and get eventually detained, and the mental wanking will stop.
To Hitek:
The political rooms are still there. It was the user-created rooms that were completely shut down.
And the answer as to the why, you gave yourself. Money making. And fighting off child predators.
Quoting Satre:"Hell is other people."
Thus spake Zarathustra....
I will go back now to dada and my own little world.
Wow, it looks like we are breeding patriots as fast as the US is breeding terrorists. Come back, come back little Sheba, I have a solution for you. The solution to the delay of debate is personally living ones life as well in the world as one would without the oppressors existent. And don't wait for someone else to lead the way, or pass a law, or approve it. Just do it, and if you are doing it anywhere right you'll be a good example for others. I grant that that example may be limited to your cellmates, but as Thoreau said, "The only place for a just man in an unjust society is in jail." Perhaps the high cost of supplying prisons for the majority of the population will get to them through their pocket books.
Now i guess i know why thay are building more and more private Jails in usa and in a private run jail thay dont have to get you health care or anything guess it will be the new motels .Who has the bucks will get a nicer place but then who knows do thay also have to provide ventalation and all your other needs in a closed in building .More and more jails i think thats the new asilums but then what do i know .But then to ware a flag a while back pre60s was that not a statment like burning one hummmm????
redwine,
the left seems paralysed by lack of a leader to inspire the mindless masses to the greatness of their original human potential as if it required a revolution. I am saying that if individuals (as individuals) realized the full implications of the direction the US is headed on the course it is staying, previous fear of being alone, or thrown in jail, or even murdered for living ones life according to the golden rule without their permission is a small price to pay for awakening the sheep to derail the fascist agenda so apparent. Besides, being alone gives one a vision of the ties to others unafraid of being alone, and by such actions the rapist, murderer, childmolester population in prison will be thinned out by the voluntary population of free thinkers and pot smokers, pretty good company. As for being killed, your reincarnation will be as a wild animal, with no problems but nature to contend with. Every great change in society has occured when the paradigm of the culture's thinking changes as witnessed by the influence of Buddha, Jesus and Mohammed in our recent past, a mere millenium ago. This millennium, this Age of Aquarius the paradigm shift must occur by each of us becoming our own avatar so that mankind can continue its evolution free of leaders in a free association of well meaning, loving individuals.
Greg, sorry: somehow I fail to see the connection between fascism, pot, rape and child molesting. Also, as child molesting may not be an act of free will always, (theft generally is)I also fail to see how free thinkers will replace those who are in jail today, not always for very godly acts.
Redwine,
I made no attempt to make the connection you seem to be trying to make. By even mentioning rapists, etc was in reference to their not being as large a portion of the prison population when arrests of unafraid freethinkers begin to swell their ranks. At some point, everyone still in the sleepy flock back home will witness at least one acquaintence being hauled off for no reason other than their opinion and the lighting of the dark will accelerate.
Before Hitler's rise to power, the German Stalinists refered to German social-democrats as social-fascist, rather than uniting with them. against Hitler.
It's more than semantics. It can lead to the death of progressive and revolutionary movements, not being precise about the nature of the enemy.
I read and now i have a headack even tho everyones comment,s are great but wow so mind blowing if you realy add it all together.Be safe walk in peace allways
Wednesday, September 27, 2006
Against Their Own
*Future Shock
Evidence of Plans to
Torture American Citizens
In what is known as mass torture technology Americans have invented a new weapon to deal with their demonstrators.
"The idea of subjecting demonstrating Americans to group torture may seem unthinkable today. Yet a few years ago we couldn't have imagined that our government would ban public demonstrations by forcing protesters into "Free Speech Zones" behind fences, miles away from other Americans. The unimaginable has now become real. This is only the next logical step, and it could happen soon".
Well that with out the electrity has been happening a lot for years now if you protest and even get all the proper papers and stuff thay pen you in and set you where you cant be sean or heard so .When it is allowed to be done to one it will be done to all sooner or later history repeats itself.To bad it cant be for the good of all human kind we do have the smarts .Sad the humanity part of the brain is not used by some leaders while other leaders become a living light to freedom.I think usa america has been sold out but thats just me and not by the people or for the people but for the selfish power welding leaders and there scary men.
This is a Tesla-Coil in the picture. Not very harmful, though, as there is high voltage, but low ampere rate...
See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_coil
Tuesday, September 26, 2006
10 Prizewinners
Gathered at PeaceJam, held in Denver last weekend, the ten Nobel Peace Laureates, together with three thousand youth from around the world, participated in the largest event of its kind in North America.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa declared that if hunger is eliminated, the world will have stopped terrorism. “If we want to live in peace, we have to realize we are all members of the same family,” said the African Nobel Peace Laureate.
John Dear, a Jesuit priest, peace activist and author of “You Will Be My Witnesses” (Orbis) and “Living Peace” (Doubleday) reported on the meeting. Mairead Maguire, Nobel laureate from Belfast, said war simply doesn’t work.
“Nuclear weapons don’t work. I don’t believe in a just war. The war on Iraq is totally immoral, totally illegal, and totally unnecessary. So we need to say no to war, and no to nuclear weapons. We need to learn the way of nonviolence.”
Said Shrini Ebadi, a judge from Iran proclaimed: “Every nation with nuclear weapons should dismantle them immediately. I wish, for example, that after 9/11 the US had built thousands of schools in Afghanistan in honor of each victim.”
President Oscar Arias of Costa Rica pointed out that “the US spends over half a trillion a year on militarism, but only a tiny fraction on food, medicine and education for the world’s poor. Real security means first of all security against hunger, disease, and poverty.”
And Rigoberta Menchu, the Guatemalan indigenous leader, cut US to the core: “If there were no wars in the world, the US economy would not prosper. Therefore, there must not be any more prosperity in the United States, if the world’s poor are to prosper.”
“When I was tortured by the Argentine Junta,” Adolfo Perez Esquivel told Fr. Dear, “I saw on the ceiling of my cell, written in blood, the words, ‘God does not kill.’ We need to learn that lesson, and resist the forces of death and destruction, and struggle for life and dignity for all. If we focus on this task, we can build peace.”
Archbishop Tutu proposed that countries export generosity instead of bombs and exhorted participants to distance themselves from the cynicism of the old that made a mess of the world. “The world is hurting. Go and heal it,” he said.
Some of the best truest kindest words i have sean writen bless all them with long life for speaking the truth.!!!!!!!!
Just as poverty breeds terrorists, overpopulation breeds further rape of the natural diversity of our planet to make room for our food. Unless this root cause of environmental and civil injustice is addressed the symptoms can only grow more devastating. Policies against contraception and abortion ultimately are the breeding ground for terrorism. I refer you to my post on this, The Dark within which We Whistle. Certainly we must feed those alive, but history and science has proven that a species population is determined by its food supply, no man made rules have effect on that. There will always be a third of mankind starving at the artificial rates of our reproduction and methods of producing food. To stop hunger we must stop population growth, then maybe we can catch up with the hunger without further rape of the planet for more food. Maybe.
Non violence, the only way to true peace. America is the opposite of peace. It is good to see such respected and important people speak out. Why can´t Americans face themselves and realize their own evil, they are their country. The world needs leaders that show peace is the way. America should stand for an example of what a nations power turned wrong will do, it is a land of evil that treatens the world in all possible ways.
There are times when we have to go to war. I do not support the Iraq war. We are borrowing ungodly amounts from the Chinese, which they are buying the debt back. I am unsure of how this will get re-paid. The current president does not care how it will get paid back, it is not going to be his responsibility
Desmond Tutu is a man of substance - he was a thorn in the side of the Apartheid regime during the 80's - they couldn't touch him because of his international position in the church - and he continues to be the voice of conscience; not only for South Africa but (as is demonstrated by this post) for the world.
Who will feed the War Machine if not the empoverished and ignorant? Would the War Machine renounce all the richness and prosperity gatheres throughout centuries of war to feed the starving child who's only sin is to be the "fruit" of another raped mother of another inter-ethnical war?
Comments On Poll #4
when the leadership fails the people or lies in mass media and controls all the new,s to a brainwashing degree how can you wake up millions who where put to sleep years ago by being tv brainwashed to comply to fear????
This poll is the opposite of the two choice poll on who would win the war between Israel and the Hezbollah. the earlier poll needed a third "none" choice and the present poll has no simple answer, even if we knew what country the question was about. Is the population responsible for a coup, whether from without or, in the case of USA, from within. I realize the US example is only a coup to those citizens who finally, suddenly awaken to it because it has been going on for a long time, very gradually, and much more noticably to the rest of the world who weren't lulled by vested interest and the fact that they were elected, smiling malevolence and all.
In a nation like America the responsibility should be with the leader the population have elected to take care of it. But under the present circumstances it appears their government has been taken over and running contrary to the will of many. In this case the population becomes responsible to get their governments actions back under control.
I believe it is unquestionably the "population" which must bear the responsibility. When they abrogate it, willingly or through coercion, bad things always happen.I could go on and on as to whose fault it is that the "people" have lost their political agency in the present but suffice it to say it is the nature of capitalism to subvert democray.
There is an interesting dynamic to all our post responses that seems driven, as unfortunately is so much in this world, by USA thought or lack thereof. Our regular users, which are spread around the world, cast choices soon after a vote appears, and results diverge from what might be expected from most in the US. Then, after they have selected and can no more, there is an increase in proportion of those not frequently here. About a third of the Forum hits are from the US, and the graphs slide toward CNN outlook. Guess if nothing else, it shows propaganda's dumb down effect.
So, I am wondering on this two choice poll, what would determine the "dumbing down" of the results? Divergence from personal opinion? If there pre-exists a right answer, the opposite of which is wrong or dumb, the poll is not to sample world opinions but to test for political correctness. One must watch CNN much more than I do to know how they would answer. In this particular poll, I could see the answer being swayed more by the recent political history of the respondents own country. Or did you mean responsibility of only US citizens or its govenment gone rogue?
Monday, September 25, 2006
Transition Plan
The following article by Carolina Cositore titled "A Transition Plan for the United States" appeared in the Opinion section of Prenza Latina.
A comment by Venezuelan writer Roberto Hernandez Montoya, in response to the US throwing millions of tax dollars into a plan to force its "transition to democracy in Cuba", to wit the US and the world would be better served by a transition to democracy in its own country "scratched behind my ears" as a friend would say, or really hit the nail on the head.
Since the United States under George W not only ignores international laws and agreements, but flouts its own Constitution, a transition to democracy there would be a very good idea indeed.
Of course since the US is a sovereign country, such a transition should not be forced from without, or engineered by a fifth column paid for by a third nation, but could be done by a nation of citizens fed up with the undemocratic way the country is being run.
Follows are a few suggestions for a draft transition plan:
First and foremost, the citizens of a free United States would have to get rid of the antiquated Electoral College that unfairly weighs votes by state and puts decisions in the hands of a few or, has happened, even one person.
Second, the two-party system has to go. Well, actually it is a one-party system with candidates usually from Yale"s Skull and Crossbones, but that"s beside the point. People in a free society need choices beginning at the neighborhood level. To do this would mean nominations from the ground up, not from a rich man´s primary system. Also limited but free and equal time campaigning on the issues is a must for a true democracy, and while we"re at it, let"s make elected officials answerable to their constituents, and give the latter power of recall.
Third, with elected officials accountable to the people, the United States might try improving its human rights record; the US is long overdue for an overhaul of its human rights to put it in spitting distance of other developed nations. Things like medical care for all, adequate food and nutrition for everyone, free child care, equally good free education, and a truly blind goddess of justice.
These suggestions are just for starters, I´m sure readers can come up with many, many more, such as control of runaway arms spending, energy conservation, and hands-on concern for the environment to name a few.
Now that I think of it, all of the above suggestions are presently practiced in Cuba.
So, there is an example out there. Implementation of such a plan for the US is in the hands of its still surviving self termed "innocents". May they figure out how to go about it before others further attempts at the task. The best we can do here on the Forum is remind them of the saw "... by any means necessary".
Finally the "rub." I could not agree more with the idea of a reorganization of government's role in the lives of its citizens. I am down with relocating major responsibility to more numerous locallized representation. As it now stands, it takes almost 7 people out of a hundred citizens to operate the US government on 44% of the national income without even considering the escalating national debt. And this is the government that is so incompetent to deal with or even care about every human rights program ever implimented! The suggested implimentation of improved and increased human rights programs can only swell the ranks of government dependent employment, even though much of its share of national income can be diverted from the giant slice the military claims and the mind control / propaganda / surveilance programs nobody claims. I just think the US is much too gigantic to even approach a true representative central government, and its size enables all kind of scoundrels to hide within, just as the black ops do today. It must become a bare bones skeleton of itself with the decisions made locally so that central representatives may be held accountable for every move. A government is not to be trusted to serve the people that must keep secrets from them.
If the human rights programs were coordinated centrally for adherence to a national standard and emergency assistance arrangements with local implimentation — great. Think globally, act locally.
I don't know how idealized my memory has made my recollections of a documentary I saw on Bali but I do remember something about all citizens taking a small part, maybe 4 hours a week, in doing government work in lieu of paying taxes. This interchangeablity precludes tendencies for experts to find profitable niches for less service than expected. I also remember the mention of the flexibility of their government in the case of their passing a law prohibiting further building with elevations taller than a coconut palm after seeing the monstrosity the first high rise they permitted was but before it was finished. Actual or not, that's good government if the term is not a natural, unavoidable oxymoron to begin with. Personally I believe humanity is potentially capable of living free of the nanny of government if it would just evolve past the teat.
Saturday, September 23, 2006
New World Vision
Of Hugo Chavez
After agreeing to supply discounted oil to the richest city in Europe - London - to help its low income residents use the city's buses at a reduced cost after earlier providing discounted heating oil for the poor in several northeastern US cities including its richest one - New York, Hugo Chavez is at it again. This time he offered to aid the US oil and cash-rich state of Alaska by providing an even greater benefit - free or subsidized heating oil.In the richest, most powerful country in the world, federal, state and local governments continue to provide fewer essential services to their citizens most in need like helping them stay warm in winter when they can't afford to do it on their own. The result is many of them don't and some die as a result.
Even without federal help, Alaska easily has enough resources and plenty of oil inside its borders to help its most needy if it chooses to. Currently the state has a Permanent Fund of $34 billion and a $2 billion budget reserve fund for a population of about 660,000 people. Still, each winter thousands of Alaskans can't afford to buy enough heating oil, especially since its price rose so dramatically in the past few years. Alaska has its own federally funded Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, but it's woefully underfunded and unable to provide enough help. So if the state and federal government won't do the job, Hugo Chavez said he would step in with financial aid through Venezuela's state-owned oil company PDVSA's subsidiary CITGO Petroleum Corporation.
The money will be donated to state Native non-profit organizations as part of a greater effort that will also help other communities in the state. It's also one part of CITGO's overall program to provide 5 - 10 million gallons of heating oil to help Native Americans nationwide. The goal is to help thousands of poor Alaskans and Native Americans in other states stay warm in the winter in cases where they're unable to get help any other way.
Think of it. Tiny Venezuela has a population of about 27 million people that's 1/12th the size of the US. And it had a 2005 Gross Domestic Product of about $160 billion that's less than 2% of the US GDP of $12.5 trillion last year and less than half of oil giant Exxon-Mobil's $371 billion 2005 sales volume. Still Hugo Chavez is willing to share his nation's oil and financial resources so those in need in the US can get some of the help its own government won't provide and help other nations as well that don't have enough ability to do it themselves. Don't ever expect Exxon-Mobil to offer aid as its game plan is to manipulate oil prices for maximum sales and profit growth with little or no regard for social responsibility that would only lower them.
The Vision of Chavez's Democratic Bolivarian Revolution Vs. Bush's Belligerent Imperialism
Look at the difference between how Hugo Chavez governs at home and shares with others abroad based on the principles of social equity and justice compared to the way George Bush does it. He and his hard-right Republican allies believe it's right to take from the poor and plunder other nations abroad to benefit the rich and powerful at home. To do it he's been waging illegal wars of aggression almost since he took office and just declared a permanent "long war" clash of civilizations against 1.8 billion Muslims worldwide to subjugate and exploit them for the corporate interests he represents.
Hugo Chavez will stand for re-election on December 3 this year. His approval rating is so high (compared to Bush's low one), no opposition candidate can defeat him in a free, fair and open election although the Bush administration is planning an unknown array of dirty tricks trying to do it. Compare that to the way elections are now run in the US where the only sure way George Bush and neocon Republicans can win is by rigging the outcomes.
Things aren't this way in Venezuela and shouldn't be anywhere. Under the letter and spirit of the Bolivarian Revolution, the country is governed under a system of real participatory democracy where the people get to vote and those they elect actually serve them. In the US what's called democracy is only for the privileged few. All others are left behind in a system morphing toward modern-day feudalism based on how an earlier failed 20th century tyrant ruled which he explained in his own words - "(by) a system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligent nationalism." Sound familiar?
The tyrant was Benito Mussolini, and he called it fascism, although despite his claim, he didn't invent it. Nineteenth century born and early 20th century philosopher Giovanni Gentile did, and he's sometimes called the "philosopher of fascism." He explained it in the Encyclopia Italiana saying "Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." Like all good dictators finding an idea he liked, Mussolini replaced Gentile's name with his own and claimed credit for it.
Now in the US under George Bush it's showing up again as a feudal corporatocracy heading straight toward a full-blown version of the Mussolini/Hitler model, US-style with many of the same trappings - a messianic mission and appeal to patriotism to fight an endless war on terrorism sacrificing constitutionally guaranteed civil liberties to do it and enriching corporations that profit from it. And all this falsely couched in the "land of the free and home of the brave" rhetoric and spirit from "The Star-Spangled Banner" anthem all children are taught at an early age to sing in school with hands over heart and never forget.
Hugo Chavez represents a different vision. Among world leaders, he's the best hope to give democracy meaning again throughout the Americas and beyond, and that's why the Bush administration is determined to oust him before he spreads much more of his good will. The Chavez way is gaining ground because it's a new paradigm based on global solidarity, equality and political, economic and social justice that opposes the failed Bush neoliberal imperial world model more people everywhere are fed up with and want no more of.
It's shown up on the streets of Mexico for weeks and again on Sunday when hundreds of thousands of people packed the great Zocalo square in Mexico City in support of winning candidate Lopez Obrador denied by massive fraud the office of president he won in July. They stand with him in solidarity and his intention to set up a parallel government after he's sworn in as its "legitimate president" on November 20. Hugo Chavez stands with him as well, and on Saturday at the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) summit in Havana accused Mexico's ruling party of stealing the election and destroying the chance for good relations with Venezuela.
There were more signs of discontent with the old order at the 16th annual NAM summit, attended by representatives from over 110 nations. At it, Hugo Chavez declared "American imperialism is in decline. A new bi-polar world is emerging. The non-aligned group has been relaunched to unite the South under its umbrella (in opposition)."
At the summit's conclusion, a final document was drafted expressing support for Venezuela, its constitutional government and democratically elected President Hugo Chavez. It criticized US aggressive policies against Chavez and supported the right of the Venezuelan people to choose their own form of government, their leader and representatives, and their economic and political system free from foreign intervention. The document also expressed "firm support and solidarity for Bolivia" and Cuba including demanding the US end its economic, trade and financial blockade that violates the UN Charter and other international law.
It also acknowledged Iran's right to develop its commercial nuclear industry that's in full compliance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) based on known evidence about it. Further, it sharply criticized US foreign policy and its wars of illegal aggression as well as Israel's wars against Lebanon and Palestine and the US role in them. It also spoke out by implication against the unilateral US domination of the UN calling on this international body to do more to respect and better represent the needs and rights of smaller nations.
The document affirmed the right of each nation's national sovereignty and was a strong rebuke of the US Bush administration and its imperial policies. In addition, it represented a strong statement of growing resistance to it from around the world that's likely to gain added resonance as long as Hugo Chavez is able to pursue his policies of putting the needs and rights of people ahead of those of wealth and power.
Other Unexpected Criticism
Chavez isn't alone as other critics are emerging in places as unexpected as the UK where British Labour Party 23-year veteran MP and former Cabinet Minister Clare Short just announced she's leaving New Labour because she's "profoundly ashamed" of the Government and Prime Minister Tony Blair's "craven" support for "US neoconservative foreign policy (that) has dishonoured the UK, undermined the UN and international law and helped to make the world a more dangerous place." She said she was "standing down (to) speak the truth and support the changes that are needed." She's not alone in the Blair government as growing numbers of other party "back-benchers" are joining her in a show of solidarity and disgust for a government allied shamelessly with Washington's corrupted notion of might makes right and the use of it in the pursuit of wealth and power as an end in itself.
Stay tuned for the coming chapters in this epic struggle for a new and better world vision and an end to the old one that doesn't work, never did or will, and that more people than ever are determined to free themselves from. It is the same message South America's great Liberator Simon Bolivar had when he once spoke of the imperial curse he sought to free his people from that "plague(d) Latin America with misery in the name of liberty."
From the NAM summit in Havana, Hugo Chavez echoed similar thoughts in his address to the General Assembly on September 15. In it he said: "....let's unite in the South and we will have a future, we will have dignity, our people will have life....Let's unite to liberate ourselves, to exist, to self-construct the South."
It's ironic that Chavez's actions should speak louder than his words, but it is his words (especially those in which he castigates Bush)that allow the US the greatest oportunities to smear him and to make him appear foolish.
I just find it overwelming sad that the whole truth is not allowed into main stream news and so many are so blind to what is truly going on and if thay are not blind may GOD help us all !!!!I know i was for so long bless that man and may he live and do all his dreams in peace .
Robinhood was the most mortal fear of the Sheriff of Knottingham and therefore his mortal enemy. Practicing charity in the parlor of Ebeneezer Scrooge, whoever heard of such a thing. Talk about yer American Idols!
Thursday, September 21, 2006
Chavez Speech
Full text of Venezuelan President, Hugo Chavez Remarks to U.N. General Assembly, New York, September 20th, 2006
President Chávez: Madame President, Excellencies, Heads of State, Heads of Governments, and high ranking government representatives from around the world. A very good day to you all.
First of all, with much respect, I would like to invite all of those, who have not had a chance, to read this book that we have read: Noam Chomsky, one of the most prestigious intellectuals of America and the world. One of Chomsky's most recent works: Hegemony or Survival?
America's Quest for Global Dominance. An excellent piece to help us understand what happened in the world during the 20th century, what is going on now and the greatest threat looming over our planet: the hegemonic pretension of US Imperialism that puts at risk the very survival of the human species. We continue to warn about this danger and call on the people of the US and the world to halt this threat that is like the sword of Damocles.
I intended to read a chapter, but for the sake of time, I will leave it as a recommendation. It's a fast read. It's really good Madame President, surely you are familiar with it. It is published in English, German, Russian, and Arabic (applause). Look, I think our brothers and sisters of the United States should be the first citizens to read this book because the threat is in their own house.
The Devil is in their home. The Devil, the Devil himself is in their home.
The Devil came here yesterday (laughter and applause). Yesterday the Devil was here, in this very place. This table from where I speak still smells like sulfur. Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, in this same hall the President of the United States, who I call "The Devil," came here talking as if he owned the world. It would take a psychiatrist to analyze the US president's speech from yesterday.
As the spokesperson for Imperialism he came to give us his recipes for maintaining the current scheme of domination, exploitation and pillage of the world's people. It would make a good Alfred Hitchcock movie. I could even suggest a title: "The Devil's Recipe." That is to say, US Imperialism, and here Chomsky says it with profound and crystalline clarity, is making desperate efforts to consolidate its hegemonic system of domination. We cannot allow this to occur, we cannot permit them to install a world dictatorship, to consolidate a world dictatorship.
The speech of the tyrannical president of the world was full of cynicism, full of hypocrisy. It is this imperial hypocrisy with which he attempts to control everything. They want to impose upon us the democratic model they devised, the false democracy of elites. And moreover, a very original democratic model imposed with explosions, bombings, invasions, and cannon shot. That's some democracy! One would have to review the thesis of Aristotle and of the first Greeks who spoke of democracy to see what kind of model of democracy is imposed by marines, invasions, aggressions and bombs.
The US president said the following yesterday in this same hall, I quote: "everywhere you turn, you hear extremists who tell you that you can escape your misery and regain your dignity through violence and terror and martyrdom." Wherever he looks he sees extremists. I am sure he sees you, brother, with your skin color, and thinks you are an extremist. With his color, the dignified President of Bolivia Evo Morales, who was here yesterday, is an extremist. The imperialists see extremists all around. No, its not that we are extremists. What is happening is that the world is waking up and people everywhere are rising up. I have the impression Mr. Imperialist dictator that you will live the rest of your days as if in a nightmare, because no matter where you look we will be rising up against US imperialism.
Yes, they call us extremists, we who demand complete freedom in the world, equality among peoples and respect for national sovereignty.
We are rising up against the Empire, against the model of domination.
Later, the president said, "Today I'd like to speak directly to the people across the broader Middle East: My country desires peace."
That is certain. If we walk the streets of the Bronx, if we walk through the streets of New York, Washington, San Diego, California, any city, San Antonio, San Francisco and we ask the people on the street: the people of the US want peace. The difference is that the government of this country, of the US, does not want peace; it wants to impose its model of exploitation and plundering and its hegemony upon us under threat of war. That is the little difference. The people want peace and, what is happening in Iraq? And what happened in Lebanon and Palestine? And what has happened over the last 100 years in Latin America and the world and now the threats against Venezuela, new threats against Iran? He spoke to the people of Lebanon, "Many of you have seen your homes and communities caught in crossfire." What cynicism! What capacity to blatantly lie before the world! The bombs in Beirut launched with milimetric precision are "crossfire"? I think that the president is thinking of those western movies where they shoot from the hip and someone ends up caught in the middle.
Imperialist fire! Fascist fire! Murderous fire! Genocidal fire against the innocent people of Palestine and Lebanon by the Empire and Israel. That is the truth. Now they say that they are upset to see homes destroyed.
In the end, the US president came to speak to the people, and also to say, "I brought some documents Madame President." This morning I was watching some of the speeches while updating mine. He spoke to the people of Afghanistan, to the people of Lebanon, to the people of Iran. One has to wonder, when listening to the US president speak to those people: what would those people say to him? If those people could talk to him, what would they say? I think I have an idea because I know the souls of the majority of those people, the people of the South, the downtrodden peoples would say: Yankee imperialist go home! That would be the shout that would echo around the world, if these people of the world could speak with only one voice to the US Empire.
Therefore, Madame President, colleagues, and friends, last year we came to this same hall, as we have for the past eight years, and we said something that today is completely confirmed. I believe that almost no one in this room would stand up to defend the system of the United Nations. Lets admit with honesty, the UN system that emerged after WWII has collapsed, shattered, it doesn't work. Well, ok. To come here and give speeches, and visit with one another once a year, yes, it works for that. And to make long documents and reflect and listen to good speeches like Evo's yesterday, and Lula's, yes, for that it works. And many speeches, like the one we just heard by the president of Sri Lanka and of the president of Chile. But we have converted this Assembly into a mere deliberative organ with no kind of power to impact in the slightest way the terrible reality the world is experiencing. Therefore we again propose here today, September 20, [2006] to re-found the United Nations. Last year Madame President, we made four modest proposals that we feel are in urgent need of being adopted by the Heads of State, Heads of Government, ambassadors and representatives. And we discussed these proposals.
First: expansion. Yesterday Lula said the same, the Security Council, its permanent as well as its non- permanent seats, must open up to new members from developed, underdeveloped and Third World countries.
That's the first priority.
Second: the application of effective methods of addressing and resolving world conflicts. Transparent methods of debate and of making decisions.
Third: the immediate suppression of the anti-democratic veto mechanism, the veto power over Security Council decisions, seems fundamental to us and is being called for by all. Here is a recent example, the immoral veto by the US government that freely allowed Israeli forces to destroy Lebanon, in front of us all, by blocking a resolution in the UN Security Council.
Fourthly: as we always say, it is necessary to strengthen the role, the powers of the general secretary of the United Nations. Yesterday we heard the speech of the general secretary, who is nearing the end of his term. He recalled that in these ten years the world has become more complicated and that the serious problems of the world, the hunger, poverty, violence, and violation of human rights have been aggravated, this is a terrible consequence of the collapse of the UN system and of US imperialist pretensions.
Madame President, recognizing our status as members, Venezuela decided several years ago to wage this battle within the UN with our voice, our modest reflections. We are an independent voice, representing dignity and the search for peace, the formulation of an international system to denounce persecution and hegemonic aggression against people worldwide. In this way Venezuela has presented its name. The homeland of Bolívar has presented its name as a candidate for a non-permanent seat on the Security Council. Of course you all know that the US government has begun an open attack, an immoral global attack in an attempt to block Venezuela from being freely elected to occupy the open seat on the Security Council. They are afraid of the truth. The empire is afraid of the truth and of independent voices. They accuse us of being extremists. They are the extremists.
I want to thank all countries that have announced your support for Venezuela, even when the vote is secret and it is not necessary for anyone to reveal their vote. But I think that the open aggression of the US Empire has reinforced the support of many countries, which in turn morally strengthened Venezuela, our people, our government. Our brothers and sisters of MERCOSUR, for example, as a block, have announced their support for Venezuela. We are now a full member of MERCOSUR along with Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay. Many other countries of Latin America, such as Bolivia and all the CARICOM nations have pledged their support to Venezuela. The entire Arab League has announced its support for Venezuela. I thank the Arab world, our brothers of the Arab world and of the Caribbean. The African Union, nearly all of the African Union countries have pledged their support for Venezuela and other countries like Russia, China and many others across the globe. I thank you all deeply in the name of Venezuela, in the name of our people and in the name of truth, because Venezuela, upon occupying a seat on the Security Council will not only bring to it the voice of Venezuela, but also the voice of the Third World, the voice of the peoples of the planet. There we will defend dignity and truth.
Despite all this Madame President, I think there are reasons to be optimistic.
Hopelessly optimistic, as a poet would say, because beyond the threats, bombs, wars, aggressions, preventative wars, and the destruction of entire peoples, one can see that a new era is dawning.
Like Silvio Rodríguez sings, "the era is giving birth to a heart."
Alternative tendencies, alternative thoughts, and youth with distinct ideas are emerging. In barely a decade it has been demonstrated that the End of History theory was totally false. The establishment of the American Empire, the American peace, the establishment of the capitalist, neoliberal model that generates misery and poverty- all totally false. The thesis is totally false and has been dumped. Now the future of the world must be defined. There is a new dawning on this planet that can be seen everywhere: in Latin America, Asia, Africa, Europe, Oceania. I want to highlight that vision of optimism to fortify our conscience and our will to fight to save the world and construct a new world, a better world.
Venezuela has joined this struggle and for this we are threatened.
The US has already planned, financed and launched a coup in Venezuela. And the US continues to support coup plotters in Venezuela. And they continue supporting terrorism against Venezuela.
President Michel Bachellet recalled a few days ago… pardon, I mean a few minutes ago… the terrible murder of the former Chilean Foreign Minster Orlando Letelier. I would only add the following: the guilty parties are free. Those responsible for that deed, in which a US citizen was also killed, are North Americans of the CIA. Terrorists of the CIA.
In addition, we here in this room must remember that in a few days it will be the 30th anniversary of that murder and of the horrible terrorist attack that blew up a Cubana de Aviación airplane in mid-flight killing 73 innocent people. And where is the worst terrorist of this continent, who admitted to being the intellectual author of the airplane sabotage? He was in prison in Venezuela for some years, but he escaped with the complicity of CIA officials and the Venezuelan government of that time. Now he is here living in the US, protected by the government even though he was convicted and he confessed. The US government has a double standard and protects terrorism.
These reflections are to demonstrate that Venezuela is committed to the fight against terrorism, against violence and works together with all people who struggle for peace and for a just world.
I spoke of the Cuban airplane. Luis Posada Carriles is the name of that terrorist. He is protected here just like the corrupt fugitives who escaped Venezuela. A group of terrorists who planted bombs in embassies of various countries, murdered innocent people during the coup and kidnapped this humble servant. They were going to execute me, but God reached out his hand, along with a group of good soldiers, and the who people took to the streets. It's a miracle that I'm here. The leaders of that coup and those terrorist acts are here, protected by the US government. I accuse the US government of protecting terrorism and of giving a completely cynical speech.
Speaking of Cuba, we went happily to Havana. We were there several days. During the G-15 Summit and the NAM Summit the dawning of a new era was evident with an historic resolution and final document. Don't worry. I am not going to read it all. But here is a collection of resolutions made in open discussion with transparency. With more than 50 Heads of State, Havana was the capital of the South for a week. We have re-launched the Non-Aligned Movement. And if there is anything I could ask of you all, my brothers and sisters, it is to please lend your support to the strengthening of the NAM, which is so important to the emergence of a new era, to preventing hegemony and imperialism. Also, you all know that we have designated Fidel Castro as President of the NAM for the next three years and we are sure that compañero President Fidel Castro will fulfill the post with much efficiency. Those who wanted Fidel to die, well, they remain frustrated because Fidel is already back in his olive green uniform and is now not only the President of Cuba but also the President of NAM.
Madam President, dear colleagues, presidents, a very strong movement of the South emerged there in Havana. We are men and women of the South. We are bearers of these documents, these ideas, opinions, and reflections. I have already closed by folder and the book that I brought with me. Don't forget it. I really recommend it. With much humility we try to contribute ideas for the salvation of the planet, to save it from the threat of imperialism, and god willing soon.
Early in this century, god willing, so that we ourselves can see and experience with our children and grandchildren a peaceful world, under the fundamental principles of the UN, renewed and relocated. I believe that the UN must be located in another country, in a city of the South. We have proposed this from Venezuela. You all know that my medical personnel had to stay locked up in the airplane. The Chief of my security is locked on the plane. They would not let them come to the UN. Another abuse and outrage Madame President that we request to be registered personally to the sulfurous Devil. But God is with us.
A warm embrace and may God bless us all. Good day.
It's not surprising that the western media has reduced this speech to a soundbite that only quotes Mr Chavez's comments about Bush being the devil.
If the more important contents of this speech were more widely publicised (as you have done Pocho) then perhaps more people would realise that when the US propaganda machine dubs Mr Chavez 'The new Castro' this should be seen as a good thing.
Viva Chavez (once again)
People come and people go but the message is the same peace and when one is heard real strongly there peace ends most of peace die who are strongly heard may oneday one of peace be heard and not die before there time.
Even better (read truthful) were Chavez comments the next day where he branded Bush, an alcoholic, John Wayne wannabe, and a sick man with a lot of hang ups. The full story is at this link on al Jazeera.
As an example of how out of touch politics in USUKI is with the people it misrepresents, Charles Rangel, a Democrat from Harlem said "I just want to make it abundantly clear to Hugo Chavez or any other president - don't come to the United States and think because we have problems with our president, that any foreigner can come to our country and not think that Americans do not feel offended when you offend our chief of state. If there's any criticism of president Bush, it should be restricted to Americans whether they voted for him or not."
Not only are they out of touch but they all seem to have a fascistic love of censureship and censorship while bold faced lying about their dedication to freedom. Slap! It's for your own good. Slap! Security is not hearing anyone but big brother. Slap. You will be offended at insults to a drunken cowboy, or else. slap…
"The era is giving birth to a heart." It is good the way Chavez gives hope in a world so threatened by Americanization. Heart is what is needing, caring about people by their leaders. It is good also the way he faces the world with the truth of what America and its leader are. These are the things that need to be said, to be heard, to be believed. Chavez is a truly great man and a hero of the people for speaking truth in high places.
I spent three weeks in Venezuela last winter on a Witness for Peace delegation investigating the effects of US foreign policy there and seeing the reality of the Bolivarian revolution.There is healthy respect and criticism there for Chavez's Latin style, from all sides, but the movement itself is deep and endogenous and it is a shame so much attention is given only to Chavez the "man".We need to talk more about the ideas he promotes.Of course US leaders are terrified of that discussion and bury it in Spectacle.
How interesting and educational it would be to be exposed to the results of a man like Chavez running a country. One really hears so little in the way of news. This new hope must wash down on his people and change their outlook daily. If one could see all the details in their working it would show up the American system that is but a farce and a cover up. Truth in words, truth in action.
Monday, September 18, 2006
Mexican Politics
*How politics are done
The article below tells some of the details of Mexicos struggle with an election fraud and how it is being handled. The article is biased but one can get the feel for what is happening.
MEXICO CITY – September 18, 2006
Mexico awoke yesterday with a new political dilemma: The country now has two presidents-elect, one of them chosen at the ballot box and the other self-anointed.
Andrés Manuel López Obrador, the leftist who lost the July 2 election, was proclaimed Mexico's "legitimate president" by nearly 200,000 supporters Saturday at a carefully orchestrated rally in Mexico City's historic central plaza.
In a moment of high theater, López Obrador asked his supporters to help him choose the date for his inauguration. After a show of hands, they chose Nov. 20 – a national holiday commemorating the Mexican Revolution. To heighten the drama, López Obrador will be "sworn in" 12 days before Felipe Calderón, the conservative from President Vicente Fox's National Action Party who won the election by 234,000 votes.
Although López Obrador's decision to appoint himself president will not be recognized by the Congress or by a majority of Mexicans, he plans to set up a "parallel government" complete with a Cabinet. He said he would end the marches and sit-ins in Mexico City and launch a nationwide movement.
"He's very canny at making news, at getting media attention, at saying things that at first sound outrageous but that are actually very carefully crafted," said political analyst Federico Estevez.
"Whether he should be called a virtual president or just the leader of the movement, it's all sort of nonsense. He can be offered crowns in the plaza but it just doesn't make any difference. He's obviously not the president. His big offensive is over in the capital city. He's cutting it off while he still has some political capital."
As he travels across Mexico, López Obrador says his objective will be to "observe, listen and capture the feelings of all the sectors and all the regions of the country."
He will evoke images of Benito Juárez, Mexico's beloved Indian president who was forced in 1863 to flee the capital and run his government from clandestine locations across the country after the French conquered Mexico and overran Mexico City.
Analysts say, the goal is to draw attention away from Calderón, who will be inaugurated Dec. 1.
Some say López Obrador's new role will be as a critical observer who can comment on the wrongs without being expected to make them right.
"By not having any responsibilities, the opposition can offer options that seem perfect," historian Lorenzo Meyer said. "The best possible government of Felipe Calderón is going to have defects. The opposition can always criticize him because reality is imperfect."
López Obrador, the former mayor of Mexico City, appears to relish such a forum, Meyer said.
"In some ways, he seems happier and freer in this role than in the role of an elected official who has to deal with the bureaucracy of the government," he said.
López Obrador's move from Mexico City to towns and villages in the countryside once again has raised questions about his strategy.
"How long? With what kind of calendar? Is it just a road show or will it be about organizing the movement and allies for the party and another run for the presidency?" Estevez asked.
López Obrador could become a powerful voice for Mexico's poor and oppressed, analysts said.
"He can turn this into a responsible examination of government policies to make sure that Calderón doesn't backslide on his commitment to uplifting the poor," said George Grayson, an expert on Mexico who teaches at the College of William & Mary. "But if he runs around in his own presidential sash, calling his loyalists to demonstrate here and there, he risks becoming a comic figure."
His antics already have cost his Democratic Revolution Party, or PRD, much of the gains it made in the months leading up to the election. After winning more seats in the Congress than in any election during its 18-year history, recent polls show the PRD's support sharply eroding.
"The price they're paying for what they've done over the past 2½ months is that their reputation is in tatters," Estevez said. "Their credibility has disappeared and everyone perceives them as unreliable."
Even as PRD legislators search for ways to shore up their credibility, they are threatening to block Calderón's inauguration.
"This is not going to be a normal inauguration for Calderón," Meyer said. "No one knows what the PRD legislators are going to do in the Congress. But they are going to do something."
With Calderón and López Obrador set to be inaugurated in less than three months, Mexicans are bracing for a protracted political crisis.
"It's going to be a long, long war," Meyer said.
By S. Lynne Walker
Welcome New User
Dear Comrades/Citizens,Can you please add me to your blog list as well?I could also add Further Left Forum to my links as well.Yours Fraternally,C.Bruce Milne.C.B.Milne.
# posted by cbmilne33: Mon Sep 18, 01:52:00 PM UTC
Sunday, September 17, 2006
Comments On Poll #3
Which is the greatest
danger to world peace?
This post is provided to allow space for comments that reflect upon or go beyond choices offered in the current poll.
Wednesday, September 13, 2006
Death Becomes Bush
Was The Headiline
A new film depicting the assassination of George Bush is proving to be successful. Death of a President, opened to a warm reception at the Toronto international film festival on Sunday and US distribution rights are sold.
The movie opens with demonstrations against Bush as he visits Chicago in 2007. He is shot by a sniper in a nearby building as he leaves a hotel. "President" Dick Cheney delivers a flowery eulogy at the funeral. A police hunt leads to the arrest of a Palestinian man on dubious evidence, who is later convicted and imprisoned even as the facts point to another person.
The film's director said "The audience reaction was very good." The movie is due to run on Britain’s More4 channel and will probably be shown widely in the US.
Caused a bit of controversy this... wonder why?
I can only think of one thing worse than having Bush as president of the USA; having Cheney as presi... oh hang on...what am I saying - he already is.
Hmmm... Did they find the sniper? Did they happen to find a book entitled "Snipping for Beginners" where the sniper was, along with a copy of the Coran and a taping of his last testimony (to be shown on Jazeera exclusively next Monday)? Did any whitness by any chance hear the sniper chant "Allahu Akbar" before commiting his deed?
Monday, September 11, 2006
Walking Blind
**
Here is an article by an American who realizes why his fellow men do not care about the wars their nation is always having. He is correct in his view of the citizens being numb. But I have little faith in the third section he speaks of that has a chance to save their country. I think it is to late for that, not repairable. The dream dissolved. America needs to finish off its fall to the bottom first before anyone will see what becomes of it.
"The reason the American people aren't shocked is the state of war, or the state of preparation for war, have been going on for so long, decades, even generations, that this has become the norm for the American people. War or the preparation for war have been going on for so long that the American people have been numbed by the processes. For a long time, in there own numb-minded way, they have understood that this is how our very mature American capitalist economy is kept functioning. In their own numb-minded way they understand that war or the preparation for war creates markets for all sorts of products and services. Further, in their own numb-minded way, they understand that we cannot sustain our American capitalist economy by exporting products and services. Therefore, in their numb-minded way, they have arrived at the point where they view war and the preparation for war as necessary and desirable. In this numb-minded condition they accept the new American fascist state with its constant state of war without so much as a weak whimper. In this numb-minded condition they even view the new American fascist state as desirable.
In other words, the culture required in America to accept and support the new American fascist military/police state has existed for quite some time. This is why the creation of the new American fascist military/police state has met so little resistance from the American people.
Is all hope lost? Maybe not! The ultimate powers in American society, which consist of the American capitalist class, Corporate America and the military/industrial complex, are deeply divided on the issue of the creation of our new American fascist military/police state. Along with the deep divided pro-fascist ultimate powers that disagree on how the new American fascist state should be managed there are those ultimate powers that are not enamored with fascism, and are very concerned about the direction the pro-fascist powers are taking America. This third faction among the ultimate powers is concerned about the fascists taking America down the road to military and economic disasters. Further, this third faction understands that the fascists do not have any real solutions to the environmental, social and economic problems confronting America. This third faction also understands that the environmental, social and economic problems must be solved to extend the useful life of the American capitalist economic system.
Our hope for maintaining our political democracy, our civil rights and the rule of law, also our hope for solving our environmental, social and economic problems, also our best chance for extending the useful life of the American capitalist economic system long enough to find a suitable replacement for capitalism and develop a culture that is capable of supporting the new economic system, depends on this third faction in the ultimate powers being able to seize control in this power struggle.
It will be very interesting to see how the power struggle among America's ultimate powers plays out."
Once again, this power struggle thing is going to be scary!
The US self anointed literary leftist litany: Make up a bunch of funny names for the other guys, pretend they are explanations, and claim what never was could be saved If only there were more people of such profundity than those with the funny names.
Saturday, September 09, 2006
Americans Or ?
Both zatikia and I have advantage in understanding what she calls "Americans". We observe them both from perspectives of homeland lives but also now in too frequent encounters from vantage of extended expatriation. As have so many in similar circumstance, we see the delusory grandeur "America" attributes to itself that when viewed from the outside appears only as a sick joke.
"America's" all pervasive internal fog concocted of hiding history, deceptive propaganda, and willful ignorance is just too thick for truth's penetration. It is our realization gained elsewhere that allows honestly joining in how "Americans" are laughed at for unrecognized stupidity and hated for effects of its application.
I believe however that zatikia's term "American" deserves expansion. The characteristics are exhibited just as strongly and in some cases more so by those of other nations and cultures, including some who in pretense pride themselves in being above it all.
At the same time, it is necessary to subtract from zatikia's "Americans", especially by picking from those often talked of as Afro-Americans, Latino-Americans, Muslim-Americans, Native-Americans, and others commonly tattooed by hyphenated label.
It would appear on surface there are no Christo-Americans, Euro-Americans, or White-Americans. But, they are there. Oh yes, they are there, though not nearly in the majority they pretend. They are the regular "Americans", those who are granted no separation mark to denote difference from a preferred norm of color, language, religion, heritage, and relative access to wealth.
Even from within those regulars, there are a few we might separate out, the daring ones who go beyond merely voicing abhorrance at attitudes of their regular cousins but also risk reputation and welfare by devoting lives to fighting conditions of their own regularity.
For myself then, zatikia's "Americans" is both too small and too large a group to characterize our concern. If there must be a label for what remains after the additions and subractions, there should be one better fitting the ilk.
Geographic latitude of heritage origin seems related, but only loosely so. Skin pigmentation or lack thereof is clearly connected. So are religious expression and preferred language. However, none of those either alone or in combination mold a better definition, for they are all but symptoms artificially fixed to the problem's roots.
There is one I've picked up in the streets among straight talking people of many places who live on the hurting side of hyphenated fences. The specific words and phrasing vary with locale and language, but the intent is always clear, and it reaches to the root.
Try "Fucking Pigs".
Thursday, September 07, 2006
Protect Yourself
*
Twisted Logic
*Why I am a Terrorist
*
By Charles Sullivan
09/03/06 "Information Clearing House" -- - According to the twisted logic recently espoused by Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, the failure to support illegal, immoral and unnecessary wars defines one as a terrorist. Let me be clear about where I stand: I know who the real terrorists are, and can name each one of them—Rumsfeld among the rest.
Everywhere you go in America you see the slogan, “Support our troops.” You see it on bumper stickers, storefronts, flags and banners, yellow ribbons and even in the windows of private homes. But what does it mean to support our troops? Is it to send them into harm’s way; to invade and occupy sovereign nations in illegal wars for empire? Is it to ask them to commit heinous crimes, to maim and to kill innocent civilians; to torture, insult, and to humiliate people who have done us no harm? Is it to steal the natural wealth that belongs to other nations and turn it over to American corporations?
If that is what it means, then I cannot support our troops. I cannot wish them well if their purpose is conquer other people, and plunder the wealth of other countries that have done us no harm. That would require me to endorse crimes against humanity conducted under the guise of national security and patriotism. I cannot do that—I will not. It is simply wrong.
Neither should we, as we so often do, confuse supporting our troops with supporting the president, or wrongful and immoral policies of corrupt government. The president and his ilk do not support our troops or he would not use them as pawns; he would take care of them when they come home broken and torn with psychic scars. He does not care about them—they are only a means to an end.
No, the best way to support our troops is to take a principled stand; to hold the moral high ground—to bring them home alive and whole. A government must not be allowed to require any of its citizens to engage in immoral or criminal behavior on its behalf. When a government behaves like a crime syndicate it does not mean that the people should follow its example—they must provide a better alternative, and refuse their allegiance to it.
So if the failure to support a government’s wrongful policies makes me a terrorist—so be it. If speaking truth to power makes one a terrorist—sign me up; move me to top of the NSA and FBI lists of suspects. Send forth the assassins with their rifles. If exposing the lies and corruption that attends power makes me a terrorist—I will proudly wear the crown and bear the cost. I will cheerfully take my place alongside other terrorists with names like Thoreau, Debs, King, Gandhi, Einstein, Zinn, and Christ.
1000% with you!
Nowadays, supporting the Bushmert is patriotism and pleading for the Palestinian and Lebanese murdered children is terrorism. Sometimes I fear the US will find it's demise at the hands of it's own imagined "wolf", as the story goes. And I hope all Earthlings will turn "terrorists" before it's too late.
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
User Log
The log lists names of all who have posted or commented in the Forum since its inception. Those are hyperlinked to posters' blogs or websites. The log can thus serve as an expanded user site link list.
Data for each user includes the date of their first post and up to the last five distinct days of any following. Each user's level of activity is summarized with a calculated maximum 100 index that can be loosely considered percentage of possible recent daily participation. Sorting differentiates at a glance the spread from recent regular participants to ones who long ago took a single shot and ran.
The log will probably be updated daily within a couple of hours after midnight UMT. Use as you choose whether seeking to better know this place, using as a link list, gauging progress in a no prize race to first clang the 100 gong, or just plain snooping.
I am glad you asked.
The formula for calculation of the Use value is
{ 100 x Sum [ (n-1) / n ] , n = 1 to 5 } / { Sum [days from today back to the nth post date ) / n ] , n = 1 to 5 }
Programmed in Excel that becomes
=271.6667/((INT($A$2)-B3)+((INT($A$2)-C3)/2)+((INT($A$2)-D3)/3)+((INT($A$2)-E3)/4)+((INT($A$2)-F3)/5))
The normalizing constant 271.66667 is 100 times the sum of 0/1 + 1/2 + 2/3 + 3/4 + 4/5, the numerator sum that would result from postings in the last 5 consecutive days. Excel specifies dates and time as a whole number of days counted from January 1, 1900 with decimal value indicating the hours portion of a day. The current date and time is kept in the fixed $A$2 cell using the Excel function =Now() + (5/24). The Now() function date and time is obtained from the computer clock and the 5 is the offset hours from computer to UMT time. The INT function strips off the decimal time portion of the day. The variables B through F cells hold the posting dates with 38636, the date number of the Forum's October 11, 2005 inception, given to the ###### cells.
Yes, this may be on the exam.
Blogger Change
I read something about blogger, taking a more Google identity, and having more features. It will mean different signing etc.
# posted by Renegade Eye: Tue Sep 05, 04:52:22 AM UTC
This paraphrases Prole's comments in the Chat room a few days ago.
"Anyone tried http://beta.blogger.com/? I just did. The biggest change is the integration of Google accounts. For the moment, you can create a new blog using your Google Account, but you'll soon be able to migrate your Blogger account over to Google. Although it's not immediately obvious, they've also made some big changes to the infrastructure - while Blogger used to create static HTML files every time you published a post, the new version just updates the information in the database and creates pages. I think it's because it's only in beta, I didn't see much difference. I don't think it effects blogger alpha, beta is based on databases and php."
Sunday, September 03, 2006
Results - Poll 2
Mark all those you consider "Terrorists"
This post is provided for comments concerning the current poll that refelect upon or go beyond choices offered.
I have an objection: Why can I not choose no answer in this poll there on the left? Or a box that says: "none of the above" to tick would be nice...
Could be for the same reason Soeren that elections to office avoid tabulating the number of people who do NOT vote and then if that number exceeds that of the choice with the most votes, declare the election void and consider another more desired form of government - perhaps one where democracy is defined not by competitive count of which group get to lord it over others but rather satisfying common wishes and needs of all.
Then I demand now that you stop your fascist ways and let me choose "none of the above" or "some other choice", otherwise I will find ways to let my voice be heard!!!!!!!! And even in any general election, there are always counts of the percentual participation of the general population in it.
I want my "none of the above"!!
I have spoken.
One thing to question in assessing poll responses is from where they originate. Our contacts currently run 43% from Usuk. (That is the colonialist nation that pretends it is two, US and UK, while in colonialism's operational reality is one, Usuk. US comes first in the naming because it leads the world in having 24 colonies while the UK is second with just 14.) Now, Usukers are hardly known as the sharpest tacks in the world awareness bulletin board unless that be shown in playing computer games that blow away darker pigmented people with names and dress unlike their own that they term "terrorists". But, their 43% gets just as much chance in our polls as users from the more enlightened rest of the world, and as in the realm of suffering and stuggle, once again influence of Usukers results in dumbing down what could otherwise be.
This is less about polls and more about the whole business of voting as a diversion from the idea that both parties are hands on the same body intending world domination. Most government offices have permanent residents, immune to election's caprices because they weren't elected, they were hired, and many don't even show up on the staff roster: I am speaking of the bureaucracy that is the machine that never leaves and supplies all elected visitors with their sage, experienced guidence. I cannot remember any election in my polically aware life that changed the course of US imperialism, unless Kennedy's dream hadn't been stillborn and had grown to maturity. Democracy fails at the population size where one doesn't have any personal knowledge of who they allow to represent them. I know, I know ... that would mean tribal councils.
So what's so wrong with taking a cue from good business principles and applying the Peter Principle to the idea of government representation of the wishes of the people, and to take it back to the level of its competency. Any central government could merely represent a court overseeing intertribal negotiations with no jurisdiction into business they were not asked to oversee by the concerned parties.
I know ...dream on
If the 43% of the USUKI's (I include Israel in your coalition of colonialists, being not much more than a middle eastern colony itself) is so unenlightened and so capable of "dumbing down" the poll, how come the leaders of these countries lead the poll by numbers greater than could be gotten by the enlightened rest of the voters alone? Blanket accusations are Bush's excuse for permissible civilian casualties!!
Pocho,
I hope you don't mind my being so impressed with the thirteen tactics on your radical activism page that I felt compelled to do a post on them. If you object to my using them in the manner I have or linking to your site, I will gladly retract both.
You got good blog, my friend
. Use as you choose.
Friday, September 01, 2006
Renegade Eye
This was left as a comment on our lead post and has been converted. Republishing of our group photo seemed appropriate.Very interesting blog. A colorful team for sure.
# posted by Renegade Eye: Fri Sep 01, 03:13:01 AM UTC
