Neither!

# posted by  Garth : Friday, April 13, 2007 at 11:12:00 AM UTC

One could always choose by flipping a coin but then would have to face the problem of deciding which to assign head and which tail.

# posted by  Pocho : Friday, April 13, 2007 at 11:42:00 AM UTC

i think i would rather stand and watch the leaders fight it out .but if i have to choose i choose to just shoot me ok i dont want to harm anyone nore do i like reading about people harming people .so i guess im weird i rather see humans helping and learning to respect and stop harming in so many ways i even do it at times and dont mean to so just shoot me ok get me out of yalls misery and my own.

# posted by  littlebitofsonshine : Friday, April 13, 2007 at 11:03:00 PM UTC

Al Qaida.
You have to admit that at least Osama doesn't lie silly excuses about his objectives.

# posted by  Puppeteer : Saturday, April 14, 2007 at 9:31:00 AM UTC

Osama oppresses more people than anyone. He love death and destructiion.

# posted by  Anonymous : Saturday, April 14, 2007 at 11:26:00 AM UTC

Not as much as Bush and Co. Read the links provided in my post above.

# posted by  Puppeteer : Saturday, April 14, 2007 at 1:10:00 PM UTC

Since the very term "Al-Qaeda" is a term dreamed up by the neocons to describe their imaginary enemy as a terrorist network rather than the helter skelter, unallied terrorist pockets it was in 2000 in order to justify reentering the daily life of the middle east, I think the question is meaningless. Now if by Al-Qaeda you mean the rallying point for all Muslims alienated by the US since "mission accomplished" were getting down to the nitty gritty. Since both sides kill more innocent people than just the people trying to kill them, I cannot sympathize with either side.

# posted by  Yodood : Friday, April 27, 2007 at 9:03:00 PM UTC