Thursday, April 12, 2007
Poll #14 Comments
If you had to fight for one, which would it be?
One could always choose by flipping a coin but then would have to face the problem of deciding which to assign head and which tail.
i think i would rather stand and watch the leaders fight it out .but if i have to choose i choose to just shoot me ok i dont want to harm anyone nore do i like reading about people harming people .so i guess im weird i rather see humans helping and learning to respect and stop harming in so many ways i even do it at times and dont mean to so just shoot me ok get me out of yalls misery and my own.
You have to admit that at least Osama doesn't lie silly excuses about his objectives.
Osama oppresses more people than anyone. He love death and destructiion.
# posted by Anonymous : Saturday, April 14, 2007 at 11:26:00 AM GMT
Not as much as Bush and Co. Read the links provided in my post above.
Since the very term "Al-Qaeda" is a term dreamed up by the neocons to describe their imaginary enemy as a terrorist network rather than the helter skelter, unallied terrorist pockets it was in 2000 in order to justify reentering the daily life of the middle east, I think the question is meaningless. Now if by Al-Qaeda you mean the rallying point for all Muslims alienated by the US since "mission accomplished" were getting down to the nitty gritty. Since both sides kill more innocent people than just the people trying to kill them, I cannot sympathize with either side.
Links to this post: